![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhhw7Ek84NwIMGejKbPkjZLLr3YrOF2ZoMKxkhjjl9DHIQ1pO2qYS2be7bmuSmGyozQY-Iydfy_VSWlqoDMrQBJHYy5MacZLgzc01wadtPf69KE72QAyaCQ5OqnXfXCWiy619_bq29zi3c/s320/Rick+Sanctorum.bmp)
Wow, Ms. Dowd, that was quite the Freudian slip, or unintended-intended pun, or whatever you want to classify it as. If it wasn't intentional, it just shows that the NYT doesn't care about editing or fact-checking anymore (To see where this chip on my shoulder comes from, click here for the un-researched article, and then here for the accurate one).
Although, I'm thinking it might be intentional because of the lead in to this article.
![](https://blogger.googleusercontent.com/img/b/R29vZ2xl/AVvXsEhZdRUZtS4d66_X1FbgtwENwII2V97NdgPfHy4oDSS3MTGnFwEsp4DRL9kF4n1b4nFUleoab8z4q55aBVSmDhwfFTnB1dkraWi9gl0C52CGCfMsrcLNPzVHeBUEQc6neSyYSGYtGUEcT8Q/s320/spreading+santorum.bmp)
Go ahead. Google 'Santorum.' It's pure filth, even by my standards, and if you've ever read this blog, you know my filth tolerance is really high.
No comments:
Post a Comment