Wednesday, February 29, 2012
Wow, Ms. Dowd, that was quite the Freudian slip, or unintended-intended pun, or whatever you want to classify it as. If it wasn't intentional, it just shows that the NYT doesn't care about editing or fact-checking anymore (To see where this chip on my shoulder comes from, click here for the un-researched article, and then here for the accurate one).
Although, I'm thinking it might be intentional because of the lead in to this article.
Go ahead. Google 'Santorum.' It's pure filth, even by my standards, and if you've ever read this blog, you know my filth tolerance is really high.